A quick update for readers: I'm going to take the month of June off from posting Friday Links, returning in July.
In the meantime, Casual Kitchen will be running a burst of posts over the next two weeks: I'll be articulating this blog's core principles in a six-part series. Enjoy! And as always I welcome your thoughts.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
"While comparisons between food and tobacco are tempting, comparisons between food and sex may prove far more meaningful." (David Katz)
I was surprised to learn that sexism goes both ways in the kitchen. (Munchies)
Critical thinking CK readers will have a field day finding gaps in the logic of this short post on food costs. There are a lot of 'em. (Pew Research, via Addicted to Canning)
We're experiencing yet another "green revolution" with remarkable innovations in drought- and flood-resistant seeds. (Economist)
The perfect, easy-to-peel boiled eggs come from... your pressure cooker? (The Kitchn)
Home fermenting: it's catching on. (Guardian)
Douglas Adams' eerily accurate rules for how we react to new technologies. (Farnam Street)
Is frugality deprivation? (Early Retirement Extreme)
Ten striking and wise lessons not taught in college. (Fee)
Book Recommendation: Daniel Kahneman's Thinking, Fast and Slow. Remember back in April when I ran a post on great books to learn about fallacies and cognitive biases? Kahneman's book is twice as good as the best of those four books. Extremely readable, incredibly useful, and after reading it, you'll never look at the world in the same way again. Highly, highly recommended.
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
The Illusion of Control and How It's Used Against You
When I was growing up on Manhattan’s Upper West Side, some of the streetlights had push buttons, crowned by a handsome black-and-white sign reading:
Longtime New Yorkers sort of suspected that they didn’t do anything. And still, they pushed. Dinner parties were riven by debates worthy of the Reformation over those buttons and whether you were actually accomplishing anything by pushing them. Many people who had been pushing those buttons for decades swore that the light turned after. ...Then in 2004, the New York Times confirmed our worst fears: the buttons had been disconnected decades before.
A few years later, I found myself walking along Riverside Drive with a childhood friend who dutifully stopped at the crosswalk, and reached for the button.
“Didn’t you hear?” I asked, surprised. “It was in the Times. The buttons don’t work.”
“I know,” he said. His outstretched finger hesitated, and then continued toward the button as if of its own will. “Just in case,” he said apologetically.
--from The Up Side of Down by Megan McArdle
We humans love to think we have more control over our environment than we do. And we do some kooky things to get that feeling of control.
Megan McArdle's story about walk signs is extra funny to me, because I'm exactly the kind of person who'd push a non-functioning walk button. I push non-functioning "close-door" buttons in elevators too. Hey, just in case.
But it's the corporate world that offers us the most frustrating example of the control illusion: In modern office buildings, it's not uncommon to find dummy thermostats on walls throughout the building. They’re there because they satisfy peoples' need for control over their environment. People adjust them and feel better afterwards--in a creepy, cubicle farm version of the placebo effect. (Weird coincidence: I actually had a non-functioning thermostat in my office in my last corporate job. I wonder now if it was some kind of sign.)
This post is starting to sound a little depressing, isn't it? So let's take this idea of the illusion of control and do something positive with it. Let's apply it to the concept of consumer empowerment, one of Casual Kitchen's central themes. And I'm guessing that anyone who's been reading Casual Kitchen for any length of time should be ready for my next sentence: the companies selling stuff to us already know all about our unconscious desire for control.
Thus, if they can sell still more stuff to us by using the control illusion, they will. Actually, they already do. With that in mind, when might our subconscious desire for control hurt us in our pocketbooks? Where might there be possible pitfalls for the consumer?
I can think of a few examples:
Paying significantly more for organic food
Many (most?) forms of insurance
Home security systems
Car alarms
"Diet" foods
Cosmetic surgery
Aggressively trading your investments
Aggressive medical/surgical treatments
Taking megavitamins and supplements
(Readers, can you think of any other examples?)
Here's the conclusion: if you want to be an empowered consumer, and if you're thinking of spending your money in any of the above realms, be extra mindful of how your desire for control can be used against you.
What do you think? Where do you see the illusion of control in your world?
For further reading:
Placebo Buttons at You Are Not So Smart
Non-functional office thermostats at Wikipedia
Interesting profile of Ellen Langer, the psychologist who developed the illusion of control idea
Megan McArdle's intriguing book The Up Side of Down: Why Failing Well Is the Key to Success which explores some of these topics in the context of life's successes and failures
Related Posts:
Money Sundays: How To Get Balanced, Consistently Useful Expert Advice
Yoga Mats, Subway, and the Azodicarbonamide Controversy: Chemical Phobia In the Media Age
Should I Be Paranoid About Grocery Store Loyalty Cards?
Retail Industry Ninja Mind Tricks
Lessons Learned From a Bathroom Renovation
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
TO CROSS STREET
PUSH BUTTON
WAIT FOR WALK SIGNAL
DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
Longtime New Yorkers sort of suspected that they didn’t do anything. And still, they pushed. Dinner parties were riven by debates worthy of the Reformation over those buttons and whether you were actually accomplishing anything by pushing them. Many people who had been pushing those buttons for decades swore that the light turned after. ...Then in 2004, the New York Times confirmed our worst fears: the buttons had been disconnected decades before.
A few years later, I found myself walking along Riverside Drive with a childhood friend who dutifully stopped at the crosswalk, and reached for the button.
“Didn’t you hear?” I asked, surprised. “It was in the Times. The buttons don’t work.”
“I know,” he said. His outstretched finger hesitated, and then continued toward the button as if of its own will. “Just in case,” he said apologetically.
--from The Up Side of Down by Megan McArdle
We humans love to think we have more control over our environment than we do. And we do some kooky things to get that feeling of control.
Megan McArdle's story about walk signs is extra funny to me, because I'm exactly the kind of person who'd push a non-functioning walk button. I push non-functioning "close-door" buttons in elevators too. Hey, just in case.
But it's the corporate world that offers us the most frustrating example of the control illusion: In modern office buildings, it's not uncommon to find dummy thermostats on walls throughout the building. They’re there because they satisfy peoples' need for control over their environment. People adjust them and feel better afterwards--in a creepy, cubicle farm version of the placebo effect. (Weird coincidence: I actually had a non-functioning thermostat in my office in my last corporate job. I wonder now if it was some kind of sign.)
This post is starting to sound a little depressing, isn't it? So let's take this idea of the illusion of control and do something positive with it. Let's apply it to the concept of consumer empowerment, one of Casual Kitchen's central themes. And I'm guessing that anyone who's been reading Casual Kitchen for any length of time should be ready for my next sentence: the companies selling stuff to us already know all about our unconscious desire for control.
Thus, if they can sell still more stuff to us by using the control illusion, they will. Actually, they already do. With that in mind, when might our subconscious desire for control hurt us in our pocketbooks? Where might there be possible pitfalls for the consumer?
I can think of a few examples:
Paying significantly more for organic food
Many (most?) forms of insurance
Home security systems
Car alarms
"Diet" foods
Cosmetic surgery
Aggressively trading your investments
Aggressive medical/surgical treatments
Taking megavitamins and supplements
(Readers, can you think of any other examples?)
Here's the conclusion: if you want to be an empowered consumer, and if you're thinking of spending your money in any of the above realms, be extra mindful of how your desire for control can be used against you.
What do you think? Where do you see the illusion of control in your world?
For further reading:
Placebo Buttons at You Are Not So Smart
Non-functional office thermostats at Wikipedia
Interesting profile of Ellen Langer, the psychologist who developed the illusion of control idea
Megan McArdle's intriguing book The Up Side of Down: Why Failing Well Is the Key to Success which explores some of these topics in the context of life's successes and failures
Related Posts:
Money Sundays: How To Get Balanced, Consistently Useful Expert Advice
Yoga Mats, Subway, and the Azodicarbonamide Controversy: Chemical Phobia In the Media Age
Should I Be Paranoid About Grocery Store Loyalty Cards?
Retail Industry Ninja Mind Tricks
Lessons Learned From a Bathroom Renovation
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Labels:
advertising,
consumer empowerment
CK Friday Links--Friday May 23, 2014
Links from around the internet. As always, I welcome your thoughts.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
"Push push push is not the way to do anything in life. Life will push back." (Happy Healthy Cook)
How to get the most value out of past-prime produce. (Penniless Parenting)
How to exfoliate your... chicken? And your cutting board. (Steamy Kitchen)
Intriguing infographic on the economics of restaurant tipping. (Accounting Degree Review) See also: Mandatory gratuity fees.
Your body language will literally impact how your life unfolds. (TEDx)
Why I stopped rolling my eyes at "trigger warnings." (New York Magazine)
"On March 7, 2014, I pulled the plug on my smartphone." (The Change Blog)
Recipe: Laughably easy and cheap Moroccan Red Lentil Soup. (Culinate, via Mary McKitrick)
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
"Push push push is not the way to do anything in life. Life will push back." (Happy Healthy Cook)
How to get the most value out of past-prime produce. (Penniless Parenting)
How to exfoliate your... chicken? And your cutting board. (Steamy Kitchen)
Intriguing infographic on the economics of restaurant tipping. (Accounting Degree Review) See also: Mandatory gratuity fees.
Your body language will literally impact how your life unfolds. (TEDx)
Why I stopped rolling my eyes at "trigger warnings." (New York Magazine)
"On March 7, 2014, I pulled the plug on my smartphone." (The Change Blog)
Recipe: Laughably easy and cheap Moroccan Red Lentil Soup. (Culinate, via Mary McKitrick)
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Labels:
links
Expediency and Treadmill Effects
Humans are expedient by nature. We're lured to convenient solutions.
Here's an example. I have a friend from another state who doesn't trust her municipal water supply. Something about fluoridation being a communist plot, and... she lost me at that point. Whatever her reason, she wants the very best for her family via a reasonably expedient solution. So, she buys bottled water from Costco.
Expedience is also why it's unlikely her solution would involve unlearning a lifelong tendency to make up conspiracy theories. After all, that would likely be a process involving a lot of learning, personal growth and development of critical thinking skills... and gosh, that could get awfully time-consuming. Instead, there’s a convenient solution just waiting for her--at a modest cost.
That's fine, it's a free country. But if you really want the very best for your family, why stop at just regular bottled water from Costco? Why not a "nicer" brand, like Evian? Or pay even more for bottled water from a specific source--say from some pristine mountain stream in northern Quebec? If you want your family to have the very best, why not seek out the finest water in the world?
Once again, it boils down to expedience. Instead of paying most of your money to get the very! best! water!, the expedient solution is not-quite-so-expensive Costco water. For my friend, her choice simply needed to be just a little bit better than the default choice of standard tap water.
Another example: you decide you want to buy a "nice" car. You select a BMW, which you intend to lease, because with a lease you can get more car for a lower payment. (Yes, I know: long-time CK readers should be groaning at the idiocy of leasing a car. Just indulge me for a minute.)
But wait: if you really wanted a nice car, why not buy a Bugatti?
Uh, dude? That's a two million dollar car. That's, uh, just a tad outside my price range.
Fair enough. In other words, you settled for the emotionally and financially expedient solution: the "nicest" car you could afford.
Do you see where this is all going? It means this: as consumers, our tendency towards expediency leads us toward solutions that, collectively, tend to eat up all our financial resources. Expediency has us always reaching just beyond our financial comfort zone to buy things that are just a little bit more expensive than the default choice of those around us.
Most importantly, this is a relativistic phenomenon that happens at every socioeconomic level. Every class has a set of various default choices that everyone at that level wants to beat, if only by just a little. And of course that slightly raises the bar for everyone else, who then go ahead and raise the bar still more. This is the hedonic treadmill of consumption, and it never ends, no matter how high up the economic ladder you climb.
This is the modern sickness of consumerism in a nutshell.
One last thought to tie everything together. Astute readers will notice that the "solution" of purchasing bottled water addresses a symptom, not the central problem. The central problem here is worrying about all the wrong things, not safe drinking water. Likewise, buying the most expensive car you can afford may potentially address your psychological compensatory symptoms, but it only indirectly--and at very high cost--solves the central problem of transport.
Note also that the bottled water industry and the luxury auto industry would prefer you didn't think about this too much.
Interestingly, this suggests that digging down to the level of your emotional needs and carefully considering exactly how those emotional needs are met (or more likely unmet) by a purchase is an extremely robust money-saving strategy. In fact, you can usually satisfy the underlying emotional need in an entirely different way that doesn't involve spending money at all. This is a central pillar of consumer empowerment.
READ NEXT: Desire Triggering
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Here's an example. I have a friend from another state who doesn't trust her municipal water supply. Something about fluoridation being a communist plot, and... she lost me at that point. Whatever her reason, she wants the very best for her family via a reasonably expedient solution. So, she buys bottled water from Costco.
Expedience is also why it's unlikely her solution would involve unlearning a lifelong tendency to make up conspiracy theories. After all, that would likely be a process involving a lot of learning, personal growth and development of critical thinking skills... and gosh, that could get awfully time-consuming. Instead, there’s a convenient solution just waiting for her--at a modest cost.
That's fine, it's a free country. But if you really want the very best for your family, why stop at just regular bottled water from Costco? Why not a "nicer" brand, like Evian? Or pay even more for bottled water from a specific source--say from some pristine mountain stream in northern Quebec? If you want your family to have the very best, why not seek out the finest water in the world?
Once again, it boils down to expedience. Instead of paying most of your money to get the very! best! water!, the expedient solution is not-quite-so-expensive Costco water. For my friend, her choice simply needed to be just a little bit better than the default choice of standard tap water.
Another example: you decide you want to buy a "nice" car. You select a BMW, which you intend to lease, because with a lease you can get more car for a lower payment. (Yes, I know: long-time CK readers should be groaning at the idiocy of leasing a car. Just indulge me for a minute.)
But wait: if you really wanted a nice car, why not buy a Bugatti?
Uh, dude? That's a two million dollar car. That's, uh, just a tad outside my price range.
Fair enough. In other words, you settled for the emotionally and financially expedient solution: the "nicest" car you could afford.
Do you see where this is all going? It means this: as consumers, our tendency towards expediency leads us toward solutions that, collectively, tend to eat up all our financial resources. Expediency has us always reaching just beyond our financial comfort zone to buy things that are just a little bit more expensive than the default choice of those around us.
Most importantly, this is a relativistic phenomenon that happens at every socioeconomic level. Every class has a set of various default choices that everyone at that level wants to beat, if only by just a little. And of course that slightly raises the bar for everyone else, who then go ahead and raise the bar still more. This is the hedonic treadmill of consumption, and it never ends, no matter how high up the economic ladder you climb.
This is the modern sickness of consumerism in a nutshell.
One last thought to tie everything together. Astute readers will notice that the "solution" of purchasing bottled water addresses a symptom, not the central problem. The central problem here is worrying about all the wrong things, not safe drinking water. Likewise, buying the most expensive car you can afford may potentially address your psychological compensatory symptoms, but it only indirectly--and at very high cost--solves the central problem of transport.
Note also that the bottled water industry and the luxury auto industry would prefer you didn't think about this too much.
Interestingly, this suggests that digging down to the level of your emotional needs and carefully considering exactly how those emotional needs are met (or more likely unmet) by a purchase is an extremely robust money-saving strategy. In fact, you can usually satisfy the underlying emotional need in an entirely different way that doesn't involve spending money at all. This is a central pillar of consumer empowerment.
READ NEXT: Desire Triggering
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
CK Friday Links--Friday May 16, 2014
Links from around the internet. As always, I welcome your thoughts.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
Let’s start off this week’s links with some great recipes:
How to make homemade Tahini. (Budget Bytes)
Hilariously cheap homemade Hard Cider. (Mr. Money Mustache)
Homemade English Muffins! (Confections of a Foodie Bride)
Sizzling Chicken with Ginger. (Monica Bhide)
Articles/Food:
Very intriguing to see agri-intellectual Mark Bittman shift his view considerably on GMOs--and admit that they’re safe. (New York Times)
Did you know that if a restaurant cuts prices you won’t like the food as much? (Science Daily)
Did you also know that veganism oppresses and disempowers women on behalf of the patriarchy? (Pacific Standard) [Ed: I gotta be honest: this article is an exceptional example of Poe’s Law. Exceptional]
Articles/Miscellaneous:
Companies actually have no idea whether their ads work or not. See also the interesting discussion in the comments. (Overcoming Bias)
“I could never be a minimalist because I have kids.” (Zen Habits)
The late Seth Roberts explains what he means by “appreciative thinking.” (Seth Roberts)
Is the USA’s debt crisis over? According to this striking chart, yep. (Bloomberg)
A system to help you remember everything you read. (Farnam Street)
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
Let’s start off this week’s links with some great recipes:
How to make homemade Tahini. (Budget Bytes)
Hilariously cheap homemade Hard Cider. (Mr. Money Mustache)
Homemade English Muffins! (Confections of a Foodie Bride)
Sizzling Chicken with Ginger. (Monica Bhide)
Articles/Food:
Very intriguing to see agri-intellectual Mark Bittman shift his view considerably on GMOs--and admit that they’re safe. (New York Times)
Did you know that if a restaurant cuts prices you won’t like the food as much? (Science Daily)
Did you also know that veganism oppresses and disempowers women on behalf of the patriarchy? (Pacific Standard) [Ed: I gotta be honest: this article is an exceptional example of Poe’s Law. Exceptional]
Articles/Miscellaneous:
Companies actually have no idea whether their ads work or not. See also the interesting discussion in the comments. (Overcoming Bias)
“I could never be a minimalist because I have kids.” (Zen Habits)
The late Seth Roberts explains what he means by “appreciative thinking.” (Seth Roberts)
Is the USA’s debt crisis over? According to this striking chart, yep. (Bloomberg)
A system to help you remember everything you read. (Farnam Street)
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Labels:
links
Consumers: Pay For Your Own Brainwashing! (Or Don't)
"I don't know. I mean, I just can't really tell much of a difference."
Readers: This was Laura's declaration recently as she was using a cotton swab she'd fished out of our medicine drawer. I'd bought some Q-Tips brand cotton swabs the day before, and she accidentally mixed them up with a pile of lower-cost store brand swabs already sitting in there.
Without really thinking about it, she'd basically created a fairly robust blind test of the two brands. And she was unable to tell them apart.
Clearly, now, there's zero reason for us to pay extra for the higher-priced Q-Tips brand.
What's embarrassing about this (and kind of hypocritical too, if you're familiar with all I've written here on consumer empowerment) is how we here at Casual Kitchen just assumed Q-Tips were better. But why? What were our reasons?
Remember, consumer products companies spend years--and billions of dollars--on advertising to turn their brands into household names. Over time, these brands stick in your mind, as if they're part of the atmosphere. They seem familiar, comfortable and better. After all, you "know" these products, right? Thus it seems somehow reasonable that these comfortably familiar brands cost more.
It was basically that, plus years of habit-based purchases, that gave us our reason for assuming Q-Tips were better. Not much of a reason, to be honest. Especially since we were paying almost double the price of the store band swabs.
Needless to say, consumer product companies love it when consumers pay extra for their products using this kind of "reasoning."
But here's the problem, and it's a doozy: By definition, all branding and advertising costs are passed through to the consumer. Think about this for a second, because it brings us to a incredibly painful conclusion: If we believe a heavily advertised brand is somehow better, it's because we paid them to persuade us!
It's like paying for your own brainwashing.
Sure, some branded products actually are better. You might love Q-Tips more than life itself, and that's cool. But at least test the assumption. Don't just eat the extra cost and let your assumptions separate you from your money.
Furthermore, don't forget: we're in the modern era of do-nothing brands, where the brand owner may not even make the product but rather contracts it out to a third-party manufacturer. Does a "familiar" brand have real value if the only thing the company does is slap a sticker on the product... and charge you extra for the privilege?
A truly empowered consumer won't buy higher-cost branded products just because she's always bought them. She won't buy them just because she has a "feeling" that they're better. After all, how did that "feeling" get there? Through millions of dollars of advertising and marketing, done over years, paid for by you. You!
Make the companies that sell stuff compete for your money, not extract it from you by default. This is a central concept--if not the central concept--of consumer empowerment.
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Readers: This was Laura's declaration recently as she was using a cotton swab she'd fished out of our medicine drawer. I'd bought some Q-Tips brand cotton swabs the day before, and she accidentally mixed them up with a pile of lower-cost store brand swabs already sitting in there.
Without really thinking about it, she'd basically created a fairly robust blind test of the two brands. And she was unable to tell them apart.
Clearly, now, there's zero reason for us to pay extra for the higher-priced Q-Tips brand.
What's embarrassing about this (and kind of hypocritical too, if you're familiar with all I've written here on consumer empowerment) is how we here at Casual Kitchen just assumed Q-Tips were better. But why? What were our reasons?
Remember, consumer products companies spend years--and billions of dollars--on advertising to turn their brands into household names. Over time, these brands stick in your mind, as if they're part of the atmosphere. They seem familiar, comfortable and better. After all, you "know" these products, right? Thus it seems somehow reasonable that these comfortably familiar brands cost more.
It was basically that, plus years of habit-based purchases, that gave us our reason for assuming Q-Tips were better. Not much of a reason, to be honest. Especially since we were paying almost double the price of the store band swabs.
Needless to say, consumer product companies love it when consumers pay extra for their products using this kind of "reasoning."
But here's the problem, and it's a doozy: By definition, all branding and advertising costs are passed through to the consumer. Think about this for a second, because it brings us to a incredibly painful conclusion: If we believe a heavily advertised brand is somehow better, it's because we paid them to persuade us!
It's like paying for your own brainwashing.
Sure, some branded products actually are better. You might love Q-Tips more than life itself, and that's cool. But at least test the assumption. Don't just eat the extra cost and let your assumptions separate you from your money.
Furthermore, don't forget: we're in the modern era of do-nothing brands, where the brand owner may not even make the product but rather contracts it out to a third-party manufacturer. Does a "familiar" brand have real value if the only thing the company does is slap a sticker on the product... and charge you extra for the privilege?
A truly empowered consumer won't buy higher-cost branded products just because she's always bought them. She won't buy them just because she has a "feeling" that they're better. After all, how did that "feeling" get there? Through millions of dollars of advertising and marketing, done over years, paid for by you. You!
Make the companies that sell stuff compete for your money, not extract it from you by default. This is a central concept--if not the central concept--of consumer empowerment.
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
CK Friday Links--Friday May 9, 2014
Links from around the internet. As always, I welcome your thoughts.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
Really interesting short video on gendered marketing. Question for readers: Do you find it insulting--or unsurprising--that the “female” version of almost every branded product costs more?
(hat tip: Alosha’s Kitchen)
Opposition to ethanol is growing because biofuels “push up food prices and disproportionately affect the poor.” (Forbes) Related: Ethanol Hurts the Poor
A striking, simple graphic that explains why organic crop yields likely cannot exceed non-organic crop yields. (Jayson Lusk)
The fact is, there has never been solid evidence that saturated fats cause disease. (Wall Street Journal) [Note: if the WSJ’s paywall stops you, just google the article’s title]
Political correctness is just another form of conspicuous consumption. (Institute of Economic Affairs)
Intriguing article on our preoccupation with overprotecting and over-monitoring our kids. (The Atlantic)
Musings on getting older and living in a popular culture designed to make you feel inadequate. (Lefsetz Letter)
An acquaintance of mine decided to shut down her startup, losing $640k of her investors’ money. This is the post she wrote afterward. Readers, what’s your reaction? (Erica.biz)
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
Really interesting short video on gendered marketing. Question for readers: Do you find it insulting--or unsurprising--that the “female” version of almost every branded product costs more?
(hat tip: Alosha’s Kitchen)
Opposition to ethanol is growing because biofuels “push up food prices and disproportionately affect the poor.” (Forbes) Related: Ethanol Hurts the Poor
A striking, simple graphic that explains why organic crop yields likely cannot exceed non-organic crop yields. (Jayson Lusk)
The fact is, there has never been solid evidence that saturated fats cause disease. (Wall Street Journal) [Note: if the WSJ’s paywall stops you, just google the article’s title]
Political correctness is just another form of conspicuous consumption. (Institute of Economic Affairs)
Intriguing article on our preoccupation with overprotecting and over-monitoring our kids. (The Atlantic)
Musings on getting older and living in a popular culture designed to make you feel inadequate. (Lefsetz Letter)
An acquaintance of mine decided to shut down her startup, losing $640k of her investors’ money. This is the post she wrote afterward. Readers, what’s your reaction? (Erica.biz)
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Labels:
links
Food Is the New Tone Deaf
Food has become more than one of life's great pleasures. It has become a signifier of style, too. The notion that "you are what you eat" extends beyond the the virtues of a nutritious, well-balanced diet. These days, it often seems that you are what you purchase in the supermarket or at the farmer's market; your grocery list is a reflection of your values and your identity. Chefs are as celebrated as designers (move over, Armani, here's Batali!) and eating and entertaining have become haute couture: Food is the new fashion.
--Martha Stewart, writing in the Huffington Post
Leave it to Martha Stewart to say something as preposterously tone deaf as the above quote. There are already far too many ways to show off and compete for status. Must we add food to the “conspicuous consumption” list too--and give consumers yet one more way to separate themselves from their money?
Most readers here at Casual Kitchen would prefer to put healthy food on our tables without worrying if our grocery list is a reflection of our “identity.” We’d also like to eat well without it costing an arm and a leg.
The problem is, there’s a false mentality embedded in Martha’s quote above that produces, in my opinion, three gigantic misconceptions people ingest when they watch food shows and read food media:
* The presumption that healthy food has to be expensive.
* The presumption that your food is a signifier of your social status.
* That presumption that there is some “style barrier” to eating well: that a simple meal, made capably in your home, somehow isn't enough anymore.
None of the above statements is true. Not even close.
Look, I understand that, as human beings, we naturally compete for status among our peers. But could we maybe try and leave food out of it?
Readers, what do you think?
Related Posts:
The Paradox of Cooking Shows
Consumer Empowerment: How To Self-Fund Your Consumer Products Purchases
How To Be Fooled By Expensive Wine
Rules For Thee, But Not For Me
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
--Martha Stewart, writing in the Huffington Post
Leave it to Martha Stewart to say something as preposterously tone deaf as the above quote. There are already far too many ways to show off and compete for status. Must we add food to the “conspicuous consumption” list too--and give consumers yet one more way to separate themselves from their money?
Most readers here at Casual Kitchen would prefer to put healthy food on our tables without worrying if our grocery list is a reflection of our “identity.” We’d also like to eat well without it costing an arm and a leg.
The problem is, there’s a false mentality embedded in Martha’s quote above that produces, in my opinion, three gigantic misconceptions people ingest when they watch food shows and read food media:
* The presumption that healthy food has to be expensive.
* The presumption that your food is a signifier of your social status.
* That presumption that there is some “style barrier” to eating well: that a simple meal, made capably in your home, somehow isn't enough anymore.
None of the above statements is true. Not even close.
Look, I understand that, as human beings, we naturally compete for status among our peers. But could we maybe try and leave food out of it?
Readers, what do you think?
Related Posts:
The Paradox of Cooking Shows
Consumer Empowerment: How To Self-Fund Your Consumer Products Purchases
How To Be Fooled By Expensive Wine
Rules For Thee, But Not For Me
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
CK Friday Links--Friday May 2, 2014
Links from around the internet. As always, I welcome your thoughts.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
Readers, I've been sick all this week with a surprisingly persistent flu bug. I'm gonna kick its ass eventually, but for now, this week's list of links is slightly shorter than normal.
Recipes:
Enough to feed an army! Spiced Fava Bean Soup. (Eats Well With Others)
A quick and easy Chicken Piccata. (100 Days of Real Food)
Make in 20 minutes: Lentils with Caramelized Onions and Purple Cabbage. (No More Ramen)
Miscellaneous:
"Don’t pretend that clicking on clickbait, reading trashy novels, watching the latest reality television show, or reading the status updates of people you don't really know is going to make you smarter." (BetaBeat)
Why you should stop lifehacking. (Rich Roll)
A really, really good reading list of stoic philosophy. (Farnam Street)
Interesting post on "the peculiar traits of rich people." (Motley Fool)
How to start investing. (A$k Liz Weston)
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
Readers, I've been sick all this week with a surprisingly persistent flu bug. I'm gonna kick its ass eventually, but for now, this week's list of links is slightly shorter than normal.
Recipes:
Enough to feed an army! Spiced Fava Bean Soup. (Eats Well With Others)
A quick and easy Chicken Piccata. (100 Days of Real Food)
Make in 20 minutes: Lentils with Caramelized Onions and Purple Cabbage. (No More Ramen)
Miscellaneous:
"Don’t pretend that clicking on clickbait, reading trashy novels, watching the latest reality television show, or reading the status updates of people you don't really know is going to make you smarter." (BetaBeat)
Why you should stop lifehacking. (Rich Roll)
A really, really good reading list of stoic philosophy. (Farnam Street)
Interesting post on "the peculiar traits of rich people." (Motley Fool)
How to start investing. (A$k Liz Weston)
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Labels:
links
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)