Links from around the internet. As always, I welcome your thoughts.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
Humor: 13 amazing food and life hacks you need to know now. (Off the Meathook)
How a fake article titled "Cuckoo For Cocoa Puffs?" was accepted by 17 medical journals. (Fast Company)
How to find time to accomplish anything. Excellent insights here. (Feld Thoughts)
Most people know that Coca-Cola initially contained cocaine as an ingredient. But do you know why? (The Society Pages)
"I audited my daily media habits to determine what was non-optimal... and how I could improve them." Intriguing ideas here about media consumption. (GigaOm)
The author of the book Nudge explains three things that will make your New Year's resolutions stick. (Bloomberg)
Related: Why do my New Year's resolutions always fail by mid-May?
The death of the "adult snow day" and what it means. (New York Magazine)
Blogging just for the hell of it. (Both Sides of the Table)
"Who's listening anymore?" (Brain Pickings)
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Status Competition
My lovely wife Laura drives a 2001 Honda Civic with 155,000 miles on it.
It's been a great little car. It gets 40+ mpg on the highway, runs well, and only once over the entire fourteen years she's owned it have we had to take it in for mechanical repairs.
Recently we were discussing this car. Laura was wondering, reasonably, whether it was time to replace it, when she would do so, what kind of car the next one would be, and so on. Granted, no car lasts forever, and after a certain age, any car can become more trouble than it's worth. But then again, it's running well, we have a backup car, and Laura has a paltry ten minute commute. In theory, we could continue driving her Civic for years.
But there's a far more important reason to keep this little old car, and that's the point of this post. I told Laura, "you're doing your coworkers and the staff in your office a big favor by continuing to drive that car. You're the doctor in your office and the staff there look up to you. You have no idea how significant it can be to see a successful person make a conscious choice to drive an older, non-flashy car. It sets an example where they can do the same and not feel self-conscious about it."
Apparently when I talk I can't follow the dictum omit needless words. So let's boil it down to one sentence: Driving an older car is one way to reduce the level of status competition in the world.
Now, obviously, Casual Kitchen readers already know status competition is a waste of time and money. What many people don't realize, however, is that status competition is also unethical.
Why unethical? Because the things you buy impact the consumption environment of everyone around you. Think of every flashy purchase as having a sort of blast radius. And the people around you--your friends, family, colleagues--are in that blast radius, and their status competition bar goes higher with every flashy purchase you make.
In other words, when we buy flashy things we don't just feed our own status competition urges. We feed everyone else's too.
Are we doing our friends, family and colleagues a favor when we do this? Is this in any way kind or generous? Readers, what do you think?
NOTE: Be sure to see the follow-up post to this article: A False Referent.
Read Next: To Kill a Good Idea
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
It's been a great little car. It gets 40+ mpg on the highway, runs well, and only once over the entire fourteen years she's owned it have we had to take it in for mechanical repairs.
Recently we were discussing this car. Laura was wondering, reasonably, whether it was time to replace it, when she would do so, what kind of car the next one would be, and so on. Granted, no car lasts forever, and after a certain age, any car can become more trouble than it's worth. But then again, it's running well, we have a backup car, and Laura has a paltry ten minute commute. In theory, we could continue driving her Civic for years.
But there's a far more important reason to keep this little old car, and that's the point of this post. I told Laura, "you're doing your coworkers and the staff in your office a big favor by continuing to drive that car. You're the doctor in your office and the staff there look up to you. You have no idea how significant it can be to see a successful person make a conscious choice to drive an older, non-flashy car. It sets an example where they can do the same and not feel self-conscious about it."
Apparently when I talk I can't follow the dictum omit needless words. So let's boil it down to one sentence: Driving an older car is one way to reduce the level of status competition in the world.
Now, obviously, Casual Kitchen readers already know status competition is a waste of time and money. What many people don't realize, however, is that status competition is also unethical.
Why unethical? Because the things you buy impact the consumption environment of everyone around you. Think of every flashy purchase as having a sort of blast radius. And the people around you--your friends, family, colleagues--are in that blast radius, and their status competition bar goes higher with every flashy purchase you make.
In other words, when we buy flashy things we don't just feed our own status competition urges. We feed everyone else's too.
Are we doing our friends, family and colleagues a favor when we do this? Is this in any way kind or generous? Readers, what do you think?
NOTE: Be sure to see the follow-up post to this article: A False Referent.
Read Next: To Kill a Good Idea
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Labels:
consumer empowerment,
saving money
CK Links--Friday January 23, 2015
Links from around the internet. As always, I welcome your thoughts.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
Why I quit being a vegan. By the author of the excellent cookbook Almost Meatless. (The Kitchn)
Related: Here's CK's review of Almost Meatless. Conclusion? I loved it.
Can haggis solve obesity? A humorous, helpful exercise in logic fallacies. (The Mirror, via Addicted to Canning)
Mark Bittman on the "state of food." Interesting to see Bittman anoint himself qualified to comment on economics now too. (New York Times)
What happened when the police and CPS investigated a family for letting their kids walk one mile home, alone? (Slate)
If you want to outsmart people who are smarter than you, temperament and life-long learning are far more important than IQ. (Farnam Street)
Optimistic time vs. Honest time. (Seth's Blog)
The difference between exposure and risk and why it matters. (Behavior Gap)
Useful stuff here: How to make impossible and emotionally charged conversations work. (Barking Up the Wrong Tree, via 50by25)
The subtle art of not giving a f*ck. (Mark Manson) Trigger warning: This article, duh, contains the F-word.
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
Why I quit being a vegan. By the author of the excellent cookbook Almost Meatless. (The Kitchn)
Related: Here's CK's review of Almost Meatless. Conclusion? I loved it.
Can haggis solve obesity? A humorous, helpful exercise in logic fallacies. (The Mirror, via Addicted to Canning)
Mark Bittman on the "state of food." Interesting to see Bittman anoint himself qualified to comment on economics now too. (New York Times)
What happened when the police and CPS investigated a family for letting their kids walk one mile home, alone? (Slate)
If you want to outsmart people who are smarter than you, temperament and life-long learning are far more important than IQ. (Farnam Street)
Optimistic time vs. Honest time. (Seth's Blog)
The difference between exposure and risk and why it matters. (Behavior Gap)
Useful stuff here: How to make impossible and emotionally charged conversations work. (Barking Up the Wrong Tree, via 50by25)
The subtle art of not giving a f*ck. (Mark Manson) Trigger warning: This article, duh, contains the F-word.
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Labels:
links
What Recipes Are In Your Heavy Rotation?
A comment from reader Sarah S:
I'd love to read a post, or an ongoing series on what is currently in your heavy rotation.
Thanks for the idea! First, a quick explanation for newer readers on what "heavy rotation" actually means. From my post Seven Ways to Get Faster at Cooking, where I first used the phrase:
Heavy Rotation:
Build a short list of your cooking "hits"--recipes that are both popular with your family and that you can make quickly and easily. Then regularly rotate one or more of these hit recipes into your weekly menu. The key here: if you make the dish regularly you'll get faster and more efficient at making it until you can practically do it blindfolded.
I've found that if you have a short list of five or six truly easy-to-make "hits" and rotate one of them into your menu each week, you can use this system indefinitely without getting sick of any of the hit recipes. Believe me, that's a far cry from a typical radio station that plays the same song every three hours! Moreover, you will find that you get quicker and quicker in finding the ingredients in the store, keeping them handy at home, and preparing and scaling up the meal itself. If you double the batch size of your heavy rotation recipes, you can efficiently take care of 1/3 or more of your meals this way, depending on the size and appetite of your family.
If I might channel my inner Michael Pollan, we could boil this down to: Find easy recipes. Make them. Not too often.
Now, to answer Sarah's question. Right now, the recipes we've got on heavy rotation are:
1) Easy Lentil Soup (the last few times I've made this I've included four cups of homemade rich chicken stock, and this soup has turned out better than ever).
2) Hilariously Easy Slow Cooker Bean Stew
3) Black Beans and Rice
4) Homemade Burritos
What grabbed me about Sarah's comment was this: it made me realize that here at Casual Kitchen we have our own rotation of heavy rotation recipes. How meta! And there are specific commonalities to these heavy rotation collections beyond just their being easy-to-make recipes.
For example, usually our heavy rotation recipes include at least one highly scalable soup or stew (often vegetarian) that leaves us plenty of leftovers. We do this for a couple of reasons: First, when our key meal of the week is vegetarian, this often translates into big savings on our food costs--a central advantage of part-time vegetarianism. This simple tactic of building a heavy rotation around a double (or triple!) batch of vegetarian soup or stew probably saves us more time and money than anything else we do in the kitchen.
Second, we eat the leftovers of this scaled-up meal on alternate days with another recipe. Why alternate days? Well, while it's true that there's no easier way to get dinner on the table than reheating something you've already made, it's also true that eating the same thing for multiple days in a row gets... tiresome. Alternating leftovers solves this problem.
Another thought: we often have a crockpot recipe in our heavy rotation. This might be something like our Chipotle Crockpot Chile, Crockpot Beef Stew, or Easy Slow Cooker Beef and Barley Stew. All of these recipes are delicious, simple, and make a ton of extra food.
Finally, Black Beans and Rice tends to show up regularly in our heavy rotation just because it's hilariously easy and we never seem to get sick of it, ever.
So, readers, now it's your turn! Share a few of your family’s favorite, easiest recipes in the comments below, and feel free to include links back to your site. Let's help each other put delicious, easy home-cooked meals on our tables!
What recipes are in your heavy rotation?
Read Next: Fair Trade: Using Poverty To Sell... More
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
I'd love to read a post, or an ongoing series on what is currently in your heavy rotation.
Thanks for the idea! First, a quick explanation for newer readers on what "heavy rotation" actually means. From my post Seven Ways to Get Faster at Cooking, where I first used the phrase:
Heavy Rotation:
Build a short list of your cooking "hits"--recipes that are both popular with your family and that you can make quickly and easily. Then regularly rotate one or more of these hit recipes into your weekly menu. The key here: if you make the dish regularly you'll get faster and more efficient at making it until you can practically do it blindfolded.
I've found that if you have a short list of five or six truly easy-to-make "hits" and rotate one of them into your menu each week, you can use this system indefinitely without getting sick of any of the hit recipes. Believe me, that's a far cry from a typical radio station that plays the same song every three hours! Moreover, you will find that you get quicker and quicker in finding the ingredients in the store, keeping them handy at home, and preparing and scaling up the meal itself. If you double the batch size of your heavy rotation recipes, you can efficiently take care of 1/3 or more of your meals this way, depending on the size and appetite of your family.
If I might channel my inner Michael Pollan, we could boil this down to: Find easy recipes. Make them. Not too often.
Now, to answer Sarah's question. Right now, the recipes we've got on heavy rotation are:
1) Easy Lentil Soup (the last few times I've made this I've included four cups of homemade rich chicken stock, and this soup has turned out better than ever).
2) Hilariously Easy Slow Cooker Bean Stew
3) Black Beans and Rice
4) Homemade Burritos
What grabbed me about Sarah's comment was this: it made me realize that here at Casual Kitchen we have our own rotation of heavy rotation recipes. How meta! And there are specific commonalities to these heavy rotation collections beyond just their being easy-to-make recipes.
For example, usually our heavy rotation recipes include at least one highly scalable soup or stew (often vegetarian) that leaves us plenty of leftovers. We do this for a couple of reasons: First, when our key meal of the week is vegetarian, this often translates into big savings on our food costs--a central advantage of part-time vegetarianism. This simple tactic of building a heavy rotation around a double (or triple!) batch of vegetarian soup or stew probably saves us more time and money than anything else we do in the kitchen.
Second, we eat the leftovers of this scaled-up meal on alternate days with another recipe. Why alternate days? Well, while it's true that there's no easier way to get dinner on the table than reheating something you've already made, it's also true that eating the same thing for multiple days in a row gets... tiresome. Alternating leftovers solves this problem.
Another thought: we often have a crockpot recipe in our heavy rotation. This might be something like our Chipotle Crockpot Chile, Crockpot Beef Stew, or Easy Slow Cooker Beef and Barley Stew. All of these recipes are delicious, simple, and make a ton of extra food.
Finally, Black Beans and Rice tends to show up regularly in our heavy rotation just because it's hilariously easy and we never seem to get sick of it, ever.
So, readers, now it's your turn! Share a few of your family’s favorite, easiest recipes in the comments below, and feel free to include links back to your site. Let's help each other put delicious, easy home-cooked meals on our tables!
What recipes are in your heavy rotation?
Read Next: Fair Trade: Using Poverty To Sell... More
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Labels:
80/20,
askcasualkitchen
Money Sundays: Lessons from the Stock Market Crash
Readers, this is a post I wrote way back in late 2008 for a now-defunct website called Helium.com. Ironically (and not due to any brilliance on my part), the lessons and insights here are probably more valuable now than they were when I wrote it. I hope you find it useful.
***************************
With most global stock markets down 30-50% year to date, and many individual investment accounts down even more than that, now is a particularly good time to see if there are any lessons we can learn from a period that, quite frankly, has been an awful experience for almost all investors. Here are seven lessons to take away from the recent stock market crash:
1) Always be liquid
No matter how good things may seem in the market, and no matter how confident you are in your future, always keep a healthy amount of liquid assets available at all times. These assets can be in the form of cash, short-term CDs or money market funds. Ideally, this money should be in addition to a fully funded 6-12 month emergency fund. You never know when you might need extra capital for an attractive investment opportunity, to fund a large unplanned liability, or to support your family during an unexpected period of unemployment. And most importantly, you never want to be in a position where you are forced to sell your long-term investment assets during a severe market correction.
How much liquidity is the right amount? A good rule of thumb is to keep 20-30% of your investment capital in risk-free, shorter-term interest bearing investments. I also suggest people keep up to two years of expenses in readily available, liquid form.
2) Avoid catastrophic losses at all costs
If you happen to suffer losses of 50% in a mutual fund or in your retirement account (something not uncommon to many investors in 2008), a curious thing happens: in order to get back to even, you will need to double your money. And assuming an average annual return of 7% (which is looking more and more like an optimistic assumption for stock market returns going forward), doubling your money will take you roughly ten years of compounding time.
Recognize that it can take many years to claw back to break even after heavy losses. When you decide what percent of your investment dollars to allocate to stocks, particularly when you are nearing retirement age, keep this concept in the very front of your mind. During certain periods of an investor's life, stocks can be far riskier than you might think.
3) Any stock can go to zero (or close)
Before the crisis, it would have seemed laughable that a company like AIG, trading at above $70 a share with all of its enormous competitive and economic advantages, could have close brush with annihilation and have its stock nearly wiped out. And yet that is exactly what happened: the stock is down 97% from its all time high and the company's prospects are permanently impaired.
Unfortunately, this isn't as unusual an occurrence as it may seem, especially during severe bear markets. So far in 2008 alone, several airlines, a number of retailers (including Circuit City and Linens'N' Things) and more than 20 financial companies (including major names like Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns and WaMu Bank) fell into bankruptcy. And in each of these cases, stockholders were left either with nothing or very close to nothing. As a stockholder, you are the first to be wiped out if a serious event occurs to a company in which you hold stock. Respect this fundamental risk inherent in owning stocks.
4) However, don’t let this scare you away from stocks
Are you wondering how I can talk about stocks going to zero in one breath and then encourage you to own them in the next? The reason is that you will never earn large investment gains over the long term by investing in bonds or bank CDs. Just be sure to recognize the risks involved in stock investing, especially during severe bear markets, and allocate your money to this asset class accordingly. And always remember one of the most important and ironic truths of investing: asset classes that are hated by investors now typically outperform in future periods. [Edit: note also the converse of this statement: asset classes loved by investors now typically underperform in future periods.]
5) Don’t limit yourself to “long only”
Most people invest in the stock market by owning mutual funds or holding shares in individual stocks. There's a fundamental problem with this: "long-only" investment vehicles like these only enrich investors during rising markets. I encourage you to add other investing tools to your investment toolbox so you can profit during all kinds of markets. Read up and learn how to short stocks. Learn how stock options work. Start small and gradually develop experience with these other types of investments, and you will become an all-weather investor.
6) Stay humble. Respect the unpredictable nature of the market
The sectors, markets and companies that may seem like great investment opportunities today quite often end up being grave disappointments to investors who follow the herd. Remember tech stocks in 1999? Or real estate in 2006? [Edit: Or oil stocks in 2013?] They seemed like great sectors at the time.
Markets can be highly counterintuitive, and risks are often only visible after the fact. Try to avoid consensus investment thinking, and don't fixate on the risks that are obvious to investors today. Instead, train yourself to anticipate what risks investors are likely to think about in the future.
7) Save more
I apologize for closing this essay with such an unpalatable final piece of advice, but the easiest way to make up for investment losses is to increase your personal savings. Most investors will need a combination of investment returns and aggressive savings to reach their financial goals, whether those goals are early retirement, a certain level of net worth, or a college fund for a young child. When your investment returns have been below your expectations, you can make up the difference by spending less of your income and allocating the extra savings to these longer-term goals.
We may live in a society that collectively saves and invests very little of its discretionary money, but if you save aggressively, take prudent risks, and remain mindful of the various strengths and weaknesses of stocks as an asset class, you will achieve your financial goals. Good luck!
Read Next: How To Get Balanced, Consistently Useful Expert Advice
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
***************************
With most global stock markets down 30-50% year to date, and many individual investment accounts down even more than that, now is a particularly good time to see if there are any lessons we can learn from a period that, quite frankly, has been an awful experience for almost all investors. Here are seven lessons to take away from the recent stock market crash:
1) Always be liquid
No matter how good things may seem in the market, and no matter how confident you are in your future, always keep a healthy amount of liquid assets available at all times. These assets can be in the form of cash, short-term CDs or money market funds. Ideally, this money should be in addition to a fully funded 6-12 month emergency fund. You never know when you might need extra capital for an attractive investment opportunity, to fund a large unplanned liability, or to support your family during an unexpected period of unemployment. And most importantly, you never want to be in a position where you are forced to sell your long-term investment assets during a severe market correction.
How much liquidity is the right amount? A good rule of thumb is to keep 20-30% of your investment capital in risk-free, shorter-term interest bearing investments. I also suggest people keep up to two years of expenses in readily available, liquid form.
2) Avoid catastrophic losses at all costs
If you happen to suffer losses of 50% in a mutual fund or in your retirement account (something not uncommon to many investors in 2008), a curious thing happens: in order to get back to even, you will need to double your money. And assuming an average annual return of 7% (which is looking more and more like an optimistic assumption for stock market returns going forward), doubling your money will take you roughly ten years of compounding time.
Recognize that it can take many years to claw back to break even after heavy losses. When you decide what percent of your investment dollars to allocate to stocks, particularly when you are nearing retirement age, keep this concept in the very front of your mind. During certain periods of an investor's life, stocks can be far riskier than you might think.
3) Any stock can go to zero (or close)
Before the crisis, it would have seemed laughable that a company like AIG, trading at above $70 a share with all of its enormous competitive and economic advantages, could have close brush with annihilation and have its stock nearly wiped out. And yet that is exactly what happened: the stock is down 97% from its all time high and the company's prospects are permanently impaired.
Unfortunately, this isn't as unusual an occurrence as it may seem, especially during severe bear markets. So far in 2008 alone, several airlines, a number of retailers (including Circuit City and Linens'N' Things) and more than 20 financial companies (including major names like Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns and WaMu Bank) fell into bankruptcy. And in each of these cases, stockholders were left either with nothing or very close to nothing. As a stockholder, you are the first to be wiped out if a serious event occurs to a company in which you hold stock. Respect this fundamental risk inherent in owning stocks.
4) However, don’t let this scare you away from stocks
Are you wondering how I can talk about stocks going to zero in one breath and then encourage you to own them in the next? The reason is that you will never earn large investment gains over the long term by investing in bonds or bank CDs. Just be sure to recognize the risks involved in stock investing, especially during severe bear markets, and allocate your money to this asset class accordingly. And always remember one of the most important and ironic truths of investing: asset classes that are hated by investors now typically outperform in future periods. [Edit: note also the converse of this statement: asset classes loved by investors now typically underperform in future periods.]
5) Don’t limit yourself to “long only”
Most people invest in the stock market by owning mutual funds or holding shares in individual stocks. There's a fundamental problem with this: "long-only" investment vehicles like these only enrich investors during rising markets. I encourage you to add other investing tools to your investment toolbox so you can profit during all kinds of markets. Read up and learn how to short stocks. Learn how stock options work. Start small and gradually develop experience with these other types of investments, and you will become an all-weather investor.
6) Stay humble. Respect the unpredictable nature of the market
The sectors, markets and companies that may seem like great investment opportunities today quite often end up being grave disappointments to investors who follow the herd. Remember tech stocks in 1999? Or real estate in 2006? [Edit: Or oil stocks in 2013?] They seemed like great sectors at the time.
Markets can be highly counterintuitive, and risks are often only visible after the fact. Try to avoid consensus investment thinking, and don't fixate on the risks that are obvious to investors today. Instead, train yourself to anticipate what risks investors are likely to think about in the future.
7) Save more
I apologize for closing this essay with such an unpalatable final piece of advice, but the easiest way to make up for investment losses is to increase your personal savings. Most investors will need a combination of investment returns and aggressive savings to reach their financial goals, whether those goals are early retirement, a certain level of net worth, or a college fund for a young child. When your investment returns have been below your expectations, you can make up the difference by spending less of your income and allocating the extra savings to these longer-term goals.
We may live in a society that collectively saves and invests very little of its discretionary money, but if you save aggressively, take prudent risks, and remain mindful of the various strengths and weaknesses of stocks as an asset class, you will achieve your financial goals. Good luck!
Read Next: How To Get Balanced, Consistently Useful Expert Advice
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Labels:
investing,
saving money
CK Links--Friday January 16, 2015
Readers! Before we get to the links this week, I want to share with you a radio interview I did with BreakThru Radio yesterday. It was a wide-ranging and really interesting conversation with DJ Jess Goulart about many of the themes we talk about here at CK: how to cook healthy food for less, how to be a savvy and empowered consumer, and much, much more. Plus some great music too. Enjoy!
Now, onto the articles! As always, I welcome your thoughts.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
Things you cannot say to a fat person. (The David Blahg)
Do organic (and "Humane Certified") egg producers get a free pass when they mistreat chickens? (Daily Pitchfork)
Wait, what? "From a health perspective, the annual physical exam is basically worthless." (New York Times)
Voracious readers offer advice on how to feed your need to read. (Fast Company)
Related: Have your own 30 day voracious reading trial.
"I would suggest that modern life works best if you design in at least a 50% safety margin." (Mr. Money Mustache)
Seven signs your fitness transformation will fail. (Bodybuilding.com)
It is amazing our country has the ability to innovate and grow despite the best efforts of Congress. (Malice For All)
The passive investing revolution will not be televised. (Monevator)
An introvert's guide to becoming more social. (The Change Blog)
Don't just focus on physical "stuff" when simplifying and decluttering. (Life Your Way)
From technologist to philosopher. (Chronicle of Higher Education)
Soren Kierkegaard schools us on why haters hate. (Brain Pickings)
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Now, onto the articles! As always, I welcome your thoughts.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
Things you cannot say to a fat person. (The David Blahg)
Do organic (and "Humane Certified") egg producers get a free pass when they mistreat chickens? (Daily Pitchfork)
Wait, what? "From a health perspective, the annual physical exam is basically worthless." (New York Times)
Voracious readers offer advice on how to feed your need to read. (Fast Company)
Related: Have your own 30 day voracious reading trial.
"I would suggest that modern life works best if you design in at least a 50% safety margin." (Mr. Money Mustache)
Seven signs your fitness transformation will fail. (Bodybuilding.com)
It is amazing our country has the ability to innovate and grow despite the best efforts of Congress. (Malice For All)
The passive investing revolution will not be televised. (Monevator)
An introvert's guide to becoming more social. (The Change Blog)
Don't just focus on physical "stuff" when simplifying and decluttering. (Life Your Way)
From technologist to philosopher. (Chronicle of Higher Education)
Soren Kierkegaard schools us on why haters hate. (Brain Pickings)
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Labels:
links
“I Don’t Want to Spend All This Time Thinking About Food.”
I don't want to spend all this time thinking about food. I just want to get dinner on the table.
This is a comment you'll often see online (and hear in real life) whenever the subject of food and frugality comes up. It's a fascinating comment because in one fell swoop it both over-complicates and misses the entire point of everything.
To see what I mean, I'll share with you a recent trip I made to the grocery store, at a time when I really didn't want to spend any time thinking or cooking. And I didn't want to spend a lot of money either. So, I bought:
1 pound of generic white beans,
1 pound of generic lentils,
Carrots and celery,
Onions,
2 cans whole peeled tomatoes and 1 can diced tomatoes.
These items enabled me to make a hug pot of Lentil Soup and another big pot of hilariously easy White Bean Stew. Voila: Dinner and lunches for several days at a total cost of maybe ten bucks, and done literally without thought.
There's a catch, however. I can do this without thought because at one time in the past I spent some time thinking about exactly what makes a given recipe cheap, easy, healthy and good. Then, I spent time looking for (and in some cases creating) many such easy and cheap recipes.
And yet our hypothetical person making the statement above doesn't have to worry about this catch: He doesn't have to spend any time thinking about this at all. He doesn't have to figure out what qualities make for easy and cheap recipes, much less does he have to come up with them. Those recipes and those ideas are already here, waiting for him!
In other words, the high-level thinking only has to occur once. Just once. Better yet, the thinking doesn't even have to happen in his head--it has to happen in mine, so I can render the ideas here, in writing, for you.
You then get to use the concepts, the ideas and all of the recipes to make your own hilariously easy and cheap meals whenever you want to.
The notion of "spending all this time thinking about food" is a canard. It's just pushback. The solutions have already been figured out, and they're waiting for you. If you're willing to see them.
Read Next: The Top Lame-Ass Excuses Between You and Better Health
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
This is a comment you'll often see online (and hear in real life) whenever the subject of food and frugality comes up. It's a fascinating comment because in one fell swoop it both over-complicates and misses the entire point of everything.
To see what I mean, I'll share with you a recent trip I made to the grocery store, at a time when I really didn't want to spend any time thinking or cooking. And I didn't want to spend a lot of money either. So, I bought:
1 pound of generic white beans,
1 pound of generic lentils,
Carrots and celery,
Onions,
2 cans whole peeled tomatoes and 1 can diced tomatoes.
These items enabled me to make a hug pot of Lentil Soup and another big pot of hilariously easy White Bean Stew. Voila: Dinner and lunches for several days at a total cost of maybe ten bucks, and done literally without thought.
There's a catch, however. I can do this without thought because at one time in the past I spent some time thinking about exactly what makes a given recipe cheap, easy, healthy and good. Then, I spent time looking for (and in some cases creating) many such easy and cheap recipes.
And yet our hypothetical person making the statement above doesn't have to worry about this catch: He doesn't have to spend any time thinking about this at all. He doesn't have to figure out what qualities make for easy and cheap recipes, much less does he have to come up with them. Those recipes and those ideas are already here, waiting for him!
In other words, the high-level thinking only has to occur once. Just once. Better yet, the thinking doesn't even have to happen in his head--it has to happen in mine, so I can render the ideas here, in writing, for you.
You then get to use the concepts, the ideas and all of the recipes to make your own hilariously easy and cheap meals whenever you want to.
The notion of "spending all this time thinking about food" is a canard. It's just pushback. The solutions have already been figured out, and they're waiting for you. If you're willing to see them.
Read Next: The Top Lame-Ass Excuses Between You and Better Health
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Labels:
excuse-making,
saving money
CK Links--Friday January 9, 2015
Links from around the internet. As always, I welcome your thoughts.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
Recipes:
A delicious homemade Chex Party Mix. Gluten free! (Food and Fire)
Jackpot! Slow Cooker Barbeque Beans (Alosha's Kitchen)
Articles:
The number one way to simplify any recipe. (Stonesoup)
What, really, is a GMO? (Jayson Lusk)
Bonus: Why is it so important that farming be a family business when most people today happily have their smart phones, cars, clothing and entertainment made by corporations? (Jayson Lusk)
The current safe drinking guidelines were invented with no medical evidence to justify them. (Zythophile, via Addicted to Canning)
Sometimes you've got to let people figure things out on their own, no matter how much you want to help them. (Financial Samurai)
How to handle criticism better. (Crew Labs, via 50by25)
Good news you probably missed in 2014. (Gates Notes)
The whole pension thing just isn't all it's cracked up to be. (Retirement: A Full Time Job)
Revisiting ten critically important basic truths of investing. (The Big Picture)
Humans are extrapolative, forgetful and thus easily separated from their money. (The Reformed Broker)
One simple thing that will increase your happiness... and save a lot of money. (A Wealth of Common Sense)
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
Recipes:
A delicious homemade Chex Party Mix. Gluten free! (Food and Fire)
Jackpot! Slow Cooker Barbeque Beans (Alosha's Kitchen)
Articles:
The number one way to simplify any recipe. (Stonesoup)
What, really, is a GMO? (Jayson Lusk)
Bonus: Why is it so important that farming be a family business when most people today happily have their smart phones, cars, clothing and entertainment made by corporations? (Jayson Lusk)
The current safe drinking guidelines were invented with no medical evidence to justify them. (Zythophile, via Addicted to Canning)
Sometimes you've got to let people figure things out on their own, no matter how much you want to help them. (Financial Samurai)
How to handle criticism better. (Crew Labs, via 50by25)
Good news you probably missed in 2014. (Gates Notes)
The whole pension thing just isn't all it's cracked up to be. (Retirement: A Full Time Job)
Revisiting ten critically important basic truths of investing. (The Big Picture)
Humans are extrapolative, forgetful and thus easily separated from their money. (The Reformed Broker)
One simple thing that will increase your happiness... and save a lot of money. (A Wealth of Common Sense)
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Labels:
links
Aspirational Marketing and the Unintended Irony of Pabst Beer
Readers, enjoy the following quote, and tell me that it doesn't make you utterly distrust all consumer branding and market segmenting techniques:
"In the early 2000s, Pabst was struggling financially. It had maxed out the white rural population that formed the core of its customer base, and it was selling less than 1 million barrels of beer a year, down from 20 million in 1970. If Pabst wanted to sell more beer, it had to look elsewhere, and Neal Stewart, a midlevel marketing manager, did. Stewart went to Portland, Oregon, where Pabst numbers were surprisingly strong and an ironic nostalgia for white working-class culture (remember trucker hats?) was widespread. If Pabst couldn't get people to drink its watery brew sincerely, Steward figured, maybe they could get people to drink it ironically. Pabst began to sponsor hipster events--gallery openings, bike messenger races, snowboarding competitions, and the like. Within a year, sales were way up--which is why, if you walk into a bar in certain Brooklyn neighborhoods, Pabst is more likely to be available than other low-end American beers.
That's not the only excursion in reinvention that Pabst did. In China, where it is branded a 'world-famous spirit,' Pabst has made itself into a luxury beverage for the cosmopolitan elite. Advertisements compare it to 'Scotch whisky, French brandy, Bordeaux wine,' and present it in a fluted champagne glass atop a wooden cask. A bottle runs about $44 in U.S. currency."
--From The Filter Bubble by Eli Pariser
So, to sum up: a mediocre beer is consumed by one group because it's cheap, by another group because it's expensive, and by a third group because it's ironic.
And yet it's the same beer. Just branded three different ways for three entirely separate populations.
Of course, there's also an implicit--perhaps even a desperate--presumption that these three populations never meet. After all, what would happen if our Chinese elite were to discover the "world-famous spirit" he buys as an act of identity construction was actually considered a mediocre beer in the USA? Worse still, what if he were to discover he was paying forty times the actual market price for this mediocre beer?
Do you think our Chinese national would be happy to learn this? Would he continue to buy it?
The answer is obvious: it would be inconceivable for him to continue buying this beer. Once he knows what it really is, and thus learns that he had previously been fooled into paying forty times the market price for it, the "value" of this product vanishes instantly. The next time he drinks a Pabst, he might as well also wear a bright red headband that says "I am a sucker" in Chinese characters. No one gets identity construction from being a sucker.
Finally, let's consider our Brooklyn- or Portland-based hipster. What happens when she learns the beer she drinks ironically is sold to wealthy Chinese elites at 40 times the price? For context, this would be like paying $1,000,000 for a Chevy sedan, or $2,400 for a pair of Levi's jeans. Wouldn't this knowledge make her feel icky, or worse, inauthentic?
This is all the wrong kind of irony.
Readers, if you ever want to see aspirational marketing for what it really is, please remember this painful example of Pabst beer. Do you still need more proof that aspirationally marketed products rudely and needlessly separate you from your money?
What are your thoughts?
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
"In the early 2000s, Pabst was struggling financially. It had maxed out the white rural population that formed the core of its customer base, and it was selling less than 1 million barrels of beer a year, down from 20 million in 1970. If Pabst wanted to sell more beer, it had to look elsewhere, and Neal Stewart, a midlevel marketing manager, did. Stewart went to Portland, Oregon, where Pabst numbers were surprisingly strong and an ironic nostalgia for white working-class culture (remember trucker hats?) was widespread. If Pabst couldn't get people to drink its watery brew sincerely, Steward figured, maybe they could get people to drink it ironically. Pabst began to sponsor hipster events--gallery openings, bike messenger races, snowboarding competitions, and the like. Within a year, sales were way up--which is why, if you walk into a bar in certain Brooklyn neighborhoods, Pabst is more likely to be available than other low-end American beers.
That's not the only excursion in reinvention that Pabst did. In China, where it is branded a 'world-famous spirit,' Pabst has made itself into a luxury beverage for the cosmopolitan elite. Advertisements compare it to 'Scotch whisky, French brandy, Bordeaux wine,' and present it in a fluted champagne glass atop a wooden cask. A bottle runs about $44 in U.S. currency."
--From The Filter Bubble by Eli Pariser
So, to sum up: a mediocre beer is consumed by one group because it's cheap, by another group because it's expensive, and by a third group because it's ironic.
And yet it's the same beer. Just branded three different ways for three entirely separate populations.
Of course, there's also an implicit--perhaps even a desperate--presumption that these three populations never meet. After all, what would happen if our Chinese elite were to discover the "world-famous spirit" he buys as an act of identity construction was actually considered a mediocre beer in the USA? Worse still, what if he were to discover he was paying forty times the actual market price for this mediocre beer?
Do you think our Chinese national would be happy to learn this? Would he continue to buy it?
The answer is obvious: it would be inconceivable for him to continue buying this beer. Once he knows what it really is, and thus learns that he had previously been fooled into paying forty times the market price for it, the "value" of this product vanishes instantly. The next time he drinks a Pabst, he might as well also wear a bright red headband that says "I am a sucker" in Chinese characters. No one gets identity construction from being a sucker.
Finally, let's consider our Brooklyn- or Portland-based hipster. What happens when she learns the beer she drinks ironically is sold to wealthy Chinese elites at 40 times the price? For context, this would be like paying $1,000,000 for a Chevy sedan, or $2,400 for a pair of Levi's jeans. Wouldn't this knowledge make her feel icky, or worse, inauthentic?
This is all the wrong kind of irony.
Readers, if you ever want to see aspirational marketing for what it really is, please remember this painful example of Pabst beer. Do you still need more proof that aspirationally marketed products rudely and needlessly separate you from your money?
What are your thoughts?
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
CK Links--Friday January 2, 2015
Welcome back from the holidays! Thanks for indulging me as I took a short break from posting towards the end of December. And in case you missed it, be sure to look over Casual Kitchen's best posts of the past year. There's some stuff in there I'm really proud of.
Now, let's get to the links! As always, I welcome your thoughts.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
Is obesity really "nobody's fault"? (Nautilus, via Addicted to Canning)
Beware when the media starts with a narrative and finds facts to fit it. (Jayson Lusk)
Absolutely hilarious to see how Chinese retailers try to emulate, copy and outright rip off foreign brands. Once again, remember: branding disempowers consumers. (New York Times)
"Mondegreens" are funny, and they give us insight into how our minds make meaning out of sound. (New Yorker)
Unexpected insights from tracking time, from the author of All the Money in the World and 168 Hours. (Laura Vanderkam)
Making the Internet a little bit freer of bullshit. (Raptitude)
"There are things in their life that are broken, and life is hard for everyone." (The Slow Hunch)
Another debate fallacy to know! "The Motte and Bailey Argument." (Slate Star Codex)
Why running hurts... everywhere. (Wired)
How to spot a terrible forecaster. (A Wealth of Common Sense)
"Pushups if late." (Tynan)
Book recommendation: Essentialism: The Disciplined Pursuit of Less by Greg McKeown. An extremely useful and inspiring handbook on how to eliminate the trivial from your life to make room for the meaningful. Highly, highly recommended, and an excellent book to pair with William Irvine's A Guide to the Good Life: The Ancient Art of Stoic Joy.
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Now, let's get to the links! As always, I welcome your thoughts.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
Is obesity really "nobody's fault"? (Nautilus, via Addicted to Canning)
Beware when the media starts with a narrative and finds facts to fit it. (Jayson Lusk)
Absolutely hilarious to see how Chinese retailers try to emulate, copy and outright rip off foreign brands. Once again, remember: branding disempowers consumers. (New York Times)
"Mondegreens" are funny, and they give us insight into how our minds make meaning out of sound. (New Yorker)
Unexpected insights from tracking time, from the author of All the Money in the World and 168 Hours. (Laura Vanderkam)
Making the Internet a little bit freer of bullshit. (Raptitude)
"There are things in their life that are broken, and life is hard for everyone." (The Slow Hunch)
Another debate fallacy to know! "The Motte and Bailey Argument." (Slate Star Codex)
Why running hurts... everywhere. (Wired)
How to spot a terrible forecaster. (A Wealth of Common Sense)
"Pushups if late." (Tynan)
Book recommendation: Essentialism: The Disciplined Pursuit of Less by Greg McKeown. An extremely useful and inspiring handbook on how to eliminate the trivial from your life to make room for the meaningful. Highly, highly recommended, and an excellent book to pair with William Irvine's A Guide to the Good Life: The Ancient Art of Stoic Joy.
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Labels:
links
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)