Recently, a striking datapoint came out on household food spending. I shared it in a Friday Links post just a few weeks ago, but I felt this data, and the trend it signifies, was worth a full post.
Here's the data in graph format, courtesy of Mark Perry's economics blog:
What this chart says is this: Now, for the first time ever, Americans spend more on food in restaurants than they spend on food to prepare and eat at home.
Which makes statements like "healthy food costs too much" and "it takes too much time and costs too much money to cook healthy food at home" even more hollow and preposterous than ever.
To see why, think about the extra and unnecessary costs we consumers bear whenever we eat out. Here are just a few:
* Rent costs for the restaurant
* Staffing costs (waiters, bar staff, hostesses, cooking staff, bussing staff)
* Extra costs for food waste/spoilage
* Advertising, marketing and promotion costs
* Tipping costs
* Sufficient residual profit needed to support the restaurant owners (or the restaurant's shareholders) and justify the restaurant remaining in business
All of these costs are passed through to the paying customer. And none of these costs above have anything to do with healthy food. They're just... costs. Essentially this is the cost stack [1] the customer bears at any restaurant that expects to stay in business. Furthermore, a restaurant will typically need to mark up the cost of the food by as much as several times in order to cover all of these ancillary costs and still earn a profit.
This means, by definition, you can cut your costs massively just by cooking something simple and easy at home. All you'll need is my post The Top 25 Laughably Cheap Recipes at Casual Kitchen (or the followup post More! Top 25 Laughably Cheap Recipes at Casual Kitchen).
Now, let's go one step further, and think about the various time costs involved in eating out. Here are some of them:
* Driving to the restaurant
* Waiting to be seated
* Ordering
* Waiting for the food to be prepared/thawed/microwaved/brought to you
* Waiting for the check
* Driving home
* Laying down on the couch because you ate too much
And so on. Obviously, you can eliminate some of these time costs by ordering takeout... or by eating a little less.
Let's take one more step, and think about some of the longer-term costs of eating out: Is the food at restaurants and take-out joints any healthier than food you can cook at home? Most likely no. And in comparison to most of the easy and laughably cheap recipes here at CK, no way.
In general, food in restaurants and takeout joints is designed for easy storage, bulk preparation, and rapid serving. As a result, it tends to be laced with sodium, sugars, and cheap hydrogenated fats. Worse, much of what we eat in restaurants is specifically engineered to make you want to eat more, and in general tends to tune your palate increasingly towards loud, salty and sugar-salt-fat-laden foods.[2] Needless to say, this engineering also tends to turn your palate away from the kind of simple, healthy, less processed and less expensive foods you can easily prepare at home.
Now, don't get me wrong: I'm not criticizing going out to eat. If you want to eat out, go for it! Enjoy it for what it is. Just don't try and claim, as you whip out your credit card to pay for your restaurant meal, that "healthy food costs too much" or "it takes way too much time to cook food at home." If you still think this, you haven't been thinking at all.
Readers, what do you think?
Footnotes/For Further Reading:
[1] For more on the concept of cost stacks and how to think about (and avoid!) unnecessary food costs as a consumer, read Casual Kitchen's Core Principle #4: Focus On First Order Foods.
[2] The topic of engineered and "hyperpalatable" food is extremely well-covered in Dr. David Kessler's intriguing book The End of Overeating: Taking Control of the Insatiable American Appetite.
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Restaurant Spending Now Exceeds In-Home Food Spending. But it Still "Costs Too Much" to Eat Healthy?
Labels:
health,
saving money,
The New Frugality
CK Links--Friday March 27, 2015
Links from around the internet. As always, I welcome your thoughts.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
Fascinating article about the creator of Cheez Whiz, and how his creation slowly evolved into "pseudo-cheese." (National Post)
Seven quick low-carb breakfast ideas. (A Sweet Life)
Your vitamins... aren't really vitamins. From the Author of Vitamania. (Slate)
Soda taxes have no effect on consumption. (Washington Post)
If California voters don't want to be forced to buy cage free eggs, why in the world did they vote for a cage-free egg bill? Why is there such a gap between how people vote and how they shop? (Jayson Lusk)
Thoughts on heat intensity and cooking. (Beyond Salmon)
Should websites shut down comments? No way. (David Jaxon)
Related: Best Practices to Raise the Level of Discussion on Your Blog
Why markets are smarter than even the smartest, most high-integrity central planners. (Ben Casnocha)
China used more cement between 2011-2013 than the USA used across the entire 20th Century. (WonkBlog)
The life and death of blogs. (Early Retirement Extreme)
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
Fascinating article about the creator of Cheez Whiz, and how his creation slowly evolved into "pseudo-cheese." (National Post)
Seven quick low-carb breakfast ideas. (A Sweet Life)
Your vitamins... aren't really vitamins. From the Author of Vitamania. (Slate)
Soda taxes have no effect on consumption. (Washington Post)
If California voters don't want to be forced to buy cage free eggs, why in the world did they vote for a cage-free egg bill? Why is there such a gap between how people vote and how they shop? (Jayson Lusk)
Thoughts on heat intensity and cooking. (Beyond Salmon)
Should websites shut down comments? No way. (David Jaxon)
Related: Best Practices to Raise the Level of Discussion on Your Blog
Why markets are smarter than even the smartest, most high-integrity central planners. (Ben Casnocha)
China used more cement between 2011-2013 than the USA used across the entire 20th Century. (WonkBlog)
The life and death of blogs. (Early Retirement Extreme)
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Labels:
links
Simple Spicy Sausage and White Bean Cassoulet
This simplified cassoulet recipe is easy, hearty and incredibly delicious. And while it may not qualify for laughably cheap, it's still pretty darn inexpensive. Enjoy!
Simple Spicy Sausage and White Bean Cassoulet
Ingredients:
3-4 hot italian-style sausage links, cut in half
1 large onion, cut into smallish wedges
1 14.5-ounce can diced tomatoes
6 garlic cloves, pressed or chopped
½ teaspoon ground thyme
A few shakes of hot red pepper flakes
A couple splashes of olive oil (maybe ⅛ of a cup in total)
A couple splashes of balsamic vinegar (a few Tablespoons, roughly)
Black pepper and salt (optional) to taste
2 14.5-ounce cans of white beans, drained and well-rinsed
A very generous 1/3 cup white wine
Directions:
1) Preheat oven to 425F (220C).
2) In a large oven-safe pan or casserole dish, place the diced tomatoes, onion wedges and garlic. Then add the sausages, drizzle with olive oil and balsamic vinegar, and add the ground thyme, salt and pepper.
3) Cook uncovered at 425F/220C for 25-30 minutes, or until the sausages are fully cooked. Add the beans and white wine, combine well, and then place back in the oven, uncovered, for an additional 15 minutes. Serve with an optional side of brown rice.
Serves 5-6.
Recipe Notes:
1) This is a low-risk recipe with all sorts of tolerances. It doesn't matter how you arrange the various ingredients in the casserole dish (although I do recommend setting the sausages on top so they can roast nicely in the oven's heat). The ingredients and quantities are flexible. Heck, you don't even really have to sweat the cooking time all that much--five or so minutes in either direction won't matter much. All in all, this dish is nearly un-screwup-able.
2) Sausages: Feel free to go fancy here and use delicatessen or butcher-grade sausages if you wish, but we merely just used normal Italian-style spicy sausages available in our local grocery store. And they were phenomenal.
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Simple Spicy Sausage and White Bean Cassoulet
Ingredients:
3-4 hot italian-style sausage links, cut in half
1 large onion, cut into smallish wedges
1 14.5-ounce can diced tomatoes
6 garlic cloves, pressed or chopped
½ teaspoon ground thyme
A few shakes of hot red pepper flakes
A couple splashes of olive oil (maybe ⅛ of a cup in total)
A couple splashes of balsamic vinegar (a few Tablespoons, roughly)
Black pepper and salt (optional) to taste
2 14.5-ounce cans of white beans, drained and well-rinsed
A very generous 1/3 cup white wine
Directions:
1) Preheat oven to 425F (220C).
2) In a large oven-safe pan or casserole dish, place the diced tomatoes, onion wedges and garlic. Then add the sausages, drizzle with olive oil and balsamic vinegar, and add the ground thyme, salt and pepper.
3) Cook uncovered at 425F/220C for 25-30 minutes, or until the sausages are fully cooked. Add the beans and white wine, combine well, and then place back in the oven, uncovered, for an additional 15 minutes. Serve with an optional side of brown rice.
Serves 5-6.
Recipe Notes:
1) This is a low-risk recipe with all sorts of tolerances. It doesn't matter how you arrange the various ingredients in the casserole dish (although I do recommend setting the sausages on top so they can roast nicely in the oven's heat). The ingredients and quantities are flexible. Heck, you don't even really have to sweat the cooking time all that much--five or so minutes in either direction won't matter much. All in all, this dish is nearly un-screwup-able.
2) Sausages: Feel free to go fancy here and use delicatessen or butcher-grade sausages if you wish, but we merely just used normal Italian-style spicy sausages available in our local grocery store. And they were phenomenal.
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Labels:
laughably easy,
laughablycheap,
recipes
CK Links--Friday March 20, 2015
Links from around the internet. As always, I welcome your thoughts.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
Four easy recipes to start off this week:
Easy Chicken, Chorizo and Shrimp Paella. (Alosha's Kitchen)
Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious Chicken Kebabs. (A Life of Spice)
Chicken Mole Chili. (My Humble Kitchen)
Serbian Potato Salad. (Bibberche)
Articles:
Did you know that a ban on fast food eateries enacted in South LA ...ended up making people in that community even fatter? (LA Times)
You get headaches from the sulfites in your wine? No, you don't. (Wall Street Journal)
Ending "Last Supper Syndrome." (Greatist, via 50 by 25)
It is ALL ridiculous. Your life, my life, and the lives of all of the people around us. (Mr. Money Mustache)
Striking post about rampant bias in social psychology. (Psychology Today)
Every day I walk the fine line between well oiled efficiency and letting patients take the time they need to tell their stories. (A Country Doctor Writes)
How to never forget a person's name. (Pick the Brain)
Book recommendation: Decisive by Dan Heath and Chip Heath. The best book I've read, ever, on decision making. Insightful, easy to read, with lots of practical advice for any life domain where you're facing difficult decisions. Extremely useful.
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
Four easy recipes to start off this week:
Easy Chicken, Chorizo and Shrimp Paella. (Alosha's Kitchen)
Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious Chicken Kebabs. (A Life of Spice)
Chicken Mole Chili. (My Humble Kitchen)
Serbian Potato Salad. (Bibberche)
Articles:
Did you know that a ban on fast food eateries enacted in South LA ...ended up making people in that community even fatter? (LA Times)
You get headaches from the sulfites in your wine? No, you don't. (Wall Street Journal)
Ending "Last Supper Syndrome." (Greatist, via 50 by 25)
It is ALL ridiculous. Your life, my life, and the lives of all of the people around us. (Mr. Money Mustache)
Striking post about rampant bias in social psychology. (Psychology Today)
Every day I walk the fine line between well oiled efficiency and letting patients take the time they need to tell their stories. (A Country Doctor Writes)
How to never forget a person's name. (Pick the Brain)
Book recommendation: Decisive by Dan Heath and Chip Heath. The best book I've read, ever, on decision making. Insightful, easy to read, with lots of practical advice for any life domain where you're facing difficult decisions. Extremely useful.
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Labels:
links
The Consumer Must Be Protected At All Times
"The consumer must be protected at all times from his own indiscretion and vanity."
--Ralph Nader
Readers, what do you think of this quote? Do you find it condescending in any way? Does it suggest to you that Ralph Nader thinks we're too foolish to know what's good for us?
Or, on the contrary, do you agree with Nader's statement? Do you think consumers (okay, maybe not all consumers, and certainly not you, but definitely many consumers) really are basically kind of dumb--thus needing protection from themselves?
Think about your answer for a minute.
To me, this is one of the most astonishing quotes of 20th Century consumer advocacy. It's also quite revealing, in that it nakedly exposes Nader's mindset and worldview.
Yes, you can see in these words a man who sincerely cares about consumers. Unfortunately, you can also see he sees them as little more than sheeple, in desperate need of guidance and protection, incapable of knowing or understanding what's good for them. And because of this, he wants to anoint "protectors" (including himself) so these defenseless consumers don't get taken advantage of.
I find it interesting to think that there could be a class of elite protectors out there not subject at all to the base human qualities of vanity and indiscretion.
Now, for a little more context about this quote. It's from an article called The Safe Car You Can't Buy published in The Nation back in 1959. It was the article that put Nader on the map and kicked off his crusade against the auto industry. And within a few years he would make himself a household name with his book Unsafe At Any Speed.
It's quite a striking experience to read this article. It's well-written, extremely persuasive, and an exceptional example of polemic--and I use the word in the non-pejorative sense.
And yet, incredibly, Nader's first prescription for making automobiles less dangerous turned out to be exactly wrong. He encouraged the car's body to be strengthened so it wouldn't be distorted by a collision. Thanks to modern crash safety technology--which now produces cars safer than anything in Nader's wildest dreams--we now know that cars should be designed to crumple around the passenger, absorbing a collision's force and energy and transferring it into the form of severe damage to the car's frame and structure.
Which is why you're now more likely than ever to survive a high speed collision. Interestingly, it's also is why a 15 mph collision leaves you stuck with a ginormous repair bill.
Let's be clear: this is not to criticize Nader's many other insightful safety ideas in the article. And of course a discussion of the ideological debate of to what extent consumers should be "protected" from themselves is beyond the scope of this blog post, and well beyond the scope of my expertise.
But what's striking here is how expert opinion can change, radically, about the best way to make cars safer. What experts "knew" then about the need for strength and rigidity of the external body of a car differs from what experts know now. It's quite sobering, even disturbing, to think that Nader's first and most prominent safety suggestion actually increases danger to passengers rather than reduces it.
Which takes me to the key point of this post. What happens when a self-styled expert, one who "knows" what's best for consumers and their safety, turns out to be wrong?
Nader obviously meant well with his crusade for consumer safety. Which is great. It's wonderful that he meant well, and I'll give him extra points for his heart being in exactly the right place. But this guy anointed himself as our protector, and he "knew" what was good for us, and yet he turned out to be wrong about what was good for us. To borrow a quote: Nader saw danger lurking everywhere but in his own directives.
So, when you're wrong about consumer safety, when you tell (or far worse, require) people to do things that later are found out to be less safe, does it matter whether you meant well?
Readers, what do you think?
For Further Reading:
1) The Safe Car You Can't Buy
Ralph Nader's landmark 1959 essay in The Nation. Masterful, highly persuasive, polemic, and containing advice later debunked by developments in crash safety technology.
2) Antifragile by Nicholas Taleb
A excellent book covering many interesting topics, but relevant here is Taleb's discussion of interventionist experts who lack "skin in game" in the very fields they regulate. See in particular Chapters 1, 2 and 3.
3) Nader's Glitter
A provocative essay by Thomas Sowell arguing that Nader's famous campaign against the Chevrolet Corvair was based on selective data and ignored significant tradeoffs.
4) The Vision of the Anointed by Thomas Sowell
Sowell was an early critic both of political correctness and of the presumed moral and intellectual superiority of policy makers. He addresses Ralph Nader in quite striking terms in Chapter 4 of this book.
Read Next: Oppositional Literature: The Key Tool For Achieving True Intellectual Honesty
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
--Ralph Nader
Readers, what do you think of this quote? Do you find it condescending in any way? Does it suggest to you that Ralph Nader thinks we're too foolish to know what's good for us?
Or, on the contrary, do you agree with Nader's statement? Do you think consumers (okay, maybe not all consumers, and certainly not you, but definitely many consumers) really are basically kind of dumb--thus needing protection from themselves?
Think about your answer for a minute.
To me, this is one of the most astonishing quotes of 20th Century consumer advocacy. It's also quite revealing, in that it nakedly exposes Nader's mindset and worldview.
Yes, you can see in these words a man who sincerely cares about consumers. Unfortunately, you can also see he sees them as little more than sheeple, in desperate need of guidance and protection, incapable of knowing or understanding what's good for them. And because of this, he wants to anoint "protectors" (including himself) so these defenseless consumers don't get taken advantage of.
I find it interesting to think that there could be a class of elite protectors out there not subject at all to the base human qualities of vanity and indiscretion.
Now, for a little more context about this quote. It's from an article called The Safe Car You Can't Buy published in The Nation back in 1959. It was the article that put Nader on the map and kicked off his crusade against the auto industry. And within a few years he would make himself a household name with his book Unsafe At Any Speed.
It's quite a striking experience to read this article. It's well-written, extremely persuasive, and an exceptional example of polemic--and I use the word in the non-pejorative sense.
And yet, incredibly, Nader's first prescription for making automobiles less dangerous turned out to be exactly wrong. He encouraged the car's body to be strengthened so it wouldn't be distorted by a collision. Thanks to modern crash safety technology--which now produces cars safer than anything in Nader's wildest dreams--we now know that cars should be designed to crumple around the passenger, absorbing a collision's force and energy and transferring it into the form of severe damage to the car's frame and structure.
Which is why you're now more likely than ever to survive a high speed collision. Interestingly, it's also is why a 15 mph collision leaves you stuck with a ginormous repair bill.
Let's be clear: this is not to criticize Nader's many other insightful safety ideas in the article. And of course a discussion of the ideological debate of to what extent consumers should be "protected" from themselves is beyond the scope of this blog post, and well beyond the scope of my expertise.
But what's striking here is how expert opinion can change, radically, about the best way to make cars safer. What experts "knew" then about the need for strength and rigidity of the external body of a car differs from what experts know now. It's quite sobering, even disturbing, to think that Nader's first and most prominent safety suggestion actually increases danger to passengers rather than reduces it.
Which takes me to the key point of this post. What happens when a self-styled expert, one who "knows" what's best for consumers and their safety, turns out to be wrong?
Nader obviously meant well with his crusade for consumer safety. Which is great. It's wonderful that he meant well, and I'll give him extra points for his heart being in exactly the right place. But this guy anointed himself as our protector, and he "knew" what was good for us, and yet he turned out to be wrong about what was good for us. To borrow a quote: Nader saw danger lurking everywhere but in his own directives.
So, when you're wrong about consumer safety, when you tell (or far worse, require) people to do things that later are found out to be less safe, does it matter whether you meant well?
Readers, what do you think?
For Further Reading:
1) The Safe Car You Can't Buy
Ralph Nader's landmark 1959 essay in The Nation. Masterful, highly persuasive, polemic, and containing advice later debunked by developments in crash safety technology.
2) Antifragile by Nicholas Taleb
A excellent book covering many interesting topics, but relevant here is Taleb's discussion of interventionist experts who lack "skin in game" in the very fields they regulate. See in particular Chapters 1, 2 and 3.
3) Nader's Glitter
A provocative essay by Thomas Sowell arguing that Nader's famous campaign against the Chevrolet Corvair was based on selective data and ignored significant tradeoffs.
4) The Vision of the Anointed by Thomas Sowell
Sowell was an early critic both of political correctness and of the presumed moral and intellectual superiority of policy makers. He addresses Ralph Nader in quite striking terms in Chapter 4 of this book.
Read Next: Oppositional Literature: The Key Tool For Achieving True Intellectual Honesty
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
CK Links--Friday March 13, 2015
Links from around the internet. As always, I welcome your thoughts.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
Striking: Americans now spend more money on food in restaurants than on food prepared at home. (Carpe Diem)
Have food labels gone too far? At what point do our food labels become misleading? (Prairie Californian)
Why we still litter. (CityLab)
When you're on a budget and out of something, it's a problem. (Frugal Healthy Simple)
Letting go of the notion of "haste while driving." (Ombailamos)
Fascinating article on seeking out genuinely thoughtful disagreement. (Institutional Investor)
Related: Oppositional Literature
"The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders." (Not Always On)
How "collaborative consumerism" will change our world. (Treehugger)
Cookbook recommendation: Fellow food blogger Rebecca Katz just published The Healthy Mind Cookbook, taking the latest research on improving cognition, mood and mental health, and translating it into delicious recipes that are great for the human mind. Have a look!
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
Striking: Americans now spend more money on food in restaurants than on food prepared at home. (Carpe Diem)
Have food labels gone too far? At what point do our food labels become misleading? (Prairie Californian)
Why we still litter. (CityLab)
When you're on a budget and out of something, it's a problem. (Frugal Healthy Simple)
Letting go of the notion of "haste while driving." (Ombailamos)
Fascinating article on seeking out genuinely thoughtful disagreement. (Institutional Investor)
Related: Oppositional Literature
"The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders." (Not Always On)
How "collaborative consumerism" will change our world. (Treehugger)
Cookbook recommendation: Fellow food blogger Rebecca Katz just published The Healthy Mind Cookbook, taking the latest research on improving cognition, mood and mental health, and translating it into delicious recipes that are great for the human mind. Have a look!
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Labels:
links
Branding By Bad Grammar
In my recent post on the return of scented consumer products, I made a snotty remark about ungrammatical label copy on a bottle of Ajax dish liquid. The label said:
Powerful Clean, Exhilarating Scent.™
I can't tell you how many times I've stared open-mouthed at that sentence, trying to make sense it.
There's clearly something wrong with this sentence, but it's not obvious what. Is there a comma missing? Should "powerful" be an adverb ("powerfully clean") rather than an adjective? More importantly, can you really trademark something written so badly?
This, readers, is nothing more than another branding technique. Its purpose is to capture and hold our attention. And it works exceptionally well.
Do you remember this slogan?
Toyota: Everyday
Or how about this one?
Think Different.
Also, if you listen really carefully, you should be able to hear a soft popping noise. That's the sound of grammar nazis' heads, exploding in the distance.
While some might consider it a generous service to humanity to dream up slogans that make grammar nazis' heads explode, this technique works differently--and in a far less generous way--on everyday non-grammar-nazi people. To a normal person, these words merely seem "off" somehow, and it causes our eyes to linger over the words for a just few moments longer than they normally would.
We're constantly surrounded by words, images, ad copy, merchandise and all sorts of commercial noise. It's too much for our minds to pay attention to it all, so we tune most of it out. But this subtle (and deeply irritating, at least to me) effect grabs a few extra milliseconds of our cognitive space before our brains move on to the next thing.
That's how a consumer products company calls attention to their dish liquid, despite the fact that it sits among a dozen essentially identical products. That's how you put a tiny little idea virus in peoples' heads so they'll remember your product, whether they want to or not.
And that's how you get consumers to buy.
Finally, readers, allow me to bestow upon you a new, fail-proof excuse you can use to get out of washing dishes:
"I can't do the dishes tonight honey, my inner grammar nazi is acting up. You wouldn't want my head to explode, would you?"
Read Next: 41 Ways You Can Help the Environment From Your Kitchen
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Powerful Clean, Exhilarating Scent.™
I can't tell you how many times I've stared open-mouthed at that sentence, trying to make sense it.
There's clearly something wrong with this sentence, but it's not obvious what. Is there a comma missing? Should "powerful" be an adverb ("powerfully clean") rather than an adjective? More importantly, can you really trademark something written so badly?
This, readers, is nothing more than another branding technique. Its purpose is to capture and hold our attention. And it works exceptionally well.
Do you remember this slogan?
Toyota: Everyday
Or how about this one?
Think Different.
Also, if you listen really carefully, you should be able to hear a soft popping noise. That's the sound of grammar nazis' heads, exploding in the distance.
While some might consider it a generous service to humanity to dream up slogans that make grammar nazis' heads explode, this technique works differently--and in a far less generous way--on everyday non-grammar-nazi people. To a normal person, these words merely seem "off" somehow, and it causes our eyes to linger over the words for a just few moments longer than they normally would.
We're constantly surrounded by words, images, ad copy, merchandise and all sorts of commercial noise. It's too much for our minds to pay attention to it all, so we tune most of it out. But this subtle (and deeply irritating, at least to me) effect grabs a few extra milliseconds of our cognitive space before our brains move on to the next thing.
That's how a consumer products company calls attention to their dish liquid, despite the fact that it sits among a dozen essentially identical products. That's how you put a tiny little idea virus in peoples' heads so they'll remember your product, whether they want to or not.
And that's how you get consumers to buy.
Finally, readers, allow me to bestow upon you a new, fail-proof excuse you can use to get out of washing dishes:
"I can't do the dishes tonight honey, my inner grammar nazi is acting up. You wouldn't want my head to explode, would you?"
Read Next: 41 Ways You Can Help the Environment From Your Kitchen
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
CK Links--Friday March 6, 2015
Aaaaand I'm back with another week's worth of links from around the internet. Thanks for your patience, readers, as I took a one week break last week. As always, I welcome your thoughts.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
Processed foods are addictive. (MedicalXpress)
"I was reminded again and again of the contempt the self-proclaimed leaders of the food movement have for industrial farmers." (Weekly Standard)
What happens when French cooking school Le Cordon Bleu puts insects on the menu? (Phys.org)
Soda and sugar taxes don't always have the effect we expect. (Jayson Lusk)
Scientists have (finally!) figured out what makes Indian food taste so good. (Washington Post)
Really useful advice here: the FBI's top hostage negotiator teaches you how to lower your bills. (Barking Up The Wrong Tree)
Excellent interview with Mr. Money Mustache. (Vox)
15 fun and inexpensive things to do with friends. (The Simple Dollar)
In the entire history of the human race, no one has ever died of inequality. But far too many have died of poverty. (Carpe Diem)
Six things you must know about how your brain learns. (Crew)
Book recommendation: Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion by Robert Cialdini. Extraordinarily (and I mean extraordinarily) useful book about techniques of compliance and persuasion--and how we can learn to resist them.
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
PS: Follow me on Twitter!
*************************
Processed foods are addictive. (MedicalXpress)
"I was reminded again and again of the contempt the self-proclaimed leaders of the food movement have for industrial farmers." (Weekly Standard)
What happens when French cooking school Le Cordon Bleu puts insects on the menu? (Phys.org)
Soda and sugar taxes don't always have the effect we expect. (Jayson Lusk)
Scientists have (finally!) figured out what makes Indian food taste so good. (Washington Post)
Really useful advice here: the FBI's top hostage negotiator teaches you how to lower your bills. (Barking Up The Wrong Tree)
Excellent interview with Mr. Money Mustache. (Vox)
15 fun and inexpensive things to do with friends. (The Simple Dollar)
In the entire history of the human race, no one has ever died of inequality. But far too many have died of poverty. (Carpe Diem)
Six things you must know about how your brain learns. (Crew)
Book recommendation: Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion by Robert Cialdini. Extraordinarily (and I mean extraordinarily) useful book about techniques of compliance and persuasion--and how we can learn to resist them.
Got an interesting article or recipe to share? Want some extra traffic at your blog? Send me an email!
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Labels:
links
Why Can't I Find People Who Share My Values on Anti-Consumerism and Frugality?
If you're serious about embracing frugality and rejecting consumerism as part of an overall strategy to build wealth for your family, there's one big thing you must accept: most of what you do, say and think will be quite different from everyone around you.
You'll experience social pressure from every direction and with every degree of subtlety: from colleagues, friends and family still plugged into the work/spend matrix, from the advertiser supported media surrounding us.... and even from your own ego, which will try nearly any tactic to get you back into the herd with everyone else.
It can feel quite lonely embracing these values, even for those people who have really mastered this domain, who have built a habit of extreme or near-extreme savings and have found great satisfaction in avoiding the pull of consumerism. I've had quite a few readers ask me, "What do you do when everybody around you is always buying stuff, eating out, and spending money like it's going out of style?"
Recently, one friend who lives in another country asked me, sadly, "Why can't I find people who share my values on spending and saving?"
Admittedly, it often feels like there just aren't all that many of us out there. If it weren't for the internet to unite us as a subculture (in particular, great sites like Mr. Money Mustache or Early Retirement Extreme that essentially act as rallying points), we'd all be little lonely islands, surrounded by a sea of people who just don't get it.
But then again I can't help thinking: if you look around and can't find people who share your values, could it be that you're just not looking hard enough?
I'll explain by way of a thought experiment. Imagine there are lots of people in your community, your neighborhood, or your country who live on less (or even much less) than you do. They are there. Then imagine how they live. What kind of cars might they drive? What kind of clothes do they wear? What kind of homes might they live in? More importantly, how prominent will these people be? Will you be able to see them? Will they stand out?
Not if you aren't looking for them.
So, why is this? Simple: because they're completely overshadowed by the people buying things and showing those things off. By definition, consumerist people are more noticeable and more prominent. Think about it: when someone engages in identity construction based on the things they own, obviously other people must see the things they own. Duh, that's how it works. This form of identity construction--as pathetically shallow as it might be--cannot be built any other way.
Now let's take this thought experiment one step further and ask a trick question: can you see the stuff that someone doesn't buy?
This, in a nutshell, is why acts of consumerism will always be more prominent, tangible and noticeable than acts of anticonsumerism. As circular as it may sound, the people who buy a lot of stuff have a lot of stuff for us to see. You aren't going to be able to spot the non-consumerist people as easily as you can spot the consumerist people. Even among people you know well.
But just because you don't see them doesn't mean they're not there. They are there. You just have to train your eyes to look for the right things. If you really see, rather than just look, you will find people who don't buy things, who don't drive flashy cars, who don't live a flashy lifestyle. Obviously they won't stand out in the typical sense of standing out. But if you can teach yourself to notice the quiet people among all the loud purchases and shouting acts of identity construction, you'll see them. Lots of them.
Much of our reality depends on the kind of mental lens we use to look at that reality. Like it or not, you tend to see what you've chosen to see. Choose properly.
Readers, share your thoughts!
Read Next: Your Money Or Your Life
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
You'll experience social pressure from every direction and with every degree of subtlety: from colleagues, friends and family still plugged into the work/spend matrix, from the advertiser supported media surrounding us.... and even from your own ego, which will try nearly any tactic to get you back into the herd with everyone else.
It can feel quite lonely embracing these values, even for those people who have really mastered this domain, who have built a habit of extreme or near-extreme savings and have found great satisfaction in avoiding the pull of consumerism. I've had quite a few readers ask me, "What do you do when everybody around you is always buying stuff, eating out, and spending money like it's going out of style?"
Recently, one friend who lives in another country asked me, sadly, "Why can't I find people who share my values on spending and saving?"
Admittedly, it often feels like there just aren't all that many of us out there. If it weren't for the internet to unite us as a subculture (in particular, great sites like Mr. Money Mustache or Early Retirement Extreme that essentially act as rallying points), we'd all be little lonely islands, surrounded by a sea of people who just don't get it.
But then again I can't help thinking: if you look around and can't find people who share your values, could it be that you're just not looking hard enough?
I'll explain by way of a thought experiment. Imagine there are lots of people in your community, your neighborhood, or your country who live on less (or even much less) than you do. They are there. Then imagine how they live. What kind of cars might they drive? What kind of clothes do they wear? What kind of homes might they live in? More importantly, how prominent will these people be? Will you be able to see them? Will they stand out?
Not if you aren't looking for them.
So, why is this? Simple: because they're completely overshadowed by the people buying things and showing those things off. By definition, consumerist people are more noticeable and more prominent. Think about it: when someone engages in identity construction based on the things they own, obviously other people must see the things they own. Duh, that's how it works. This form of identity construction--as pathetically shallow as it might be--cannot be built any other way.
Now let's take this thought experiment one step further and ask a trick question: can you see the stuff that someone doesn't buy?
This, in a nutshell, is why acts of consumerism will always be more prominent, tangible and noticeable than acts of anticonsumerism. As circular as it may sound, the people who buy a lot of stuff have a lot of stuff for us to see. You aren't going to be able to spot the non-consumerist people as easily as you can spot the consumerist people. Even among people you know well.
But just because you don't see them doesn't mean they're not there. They are there. You just have to train your eyes to look for the right things. If you really see, rather than just look, you will find people who don't buy things, who don't drive flashy cars, who don't live a flashy lifestyle. Obviously they won't stand out in the typical sense of standing out. But if you can teach yourself to notice the quiet people among all the loud purchases and shouting acts of identity construction, you'll see them. Lots of them.
Much of our reality depends on the kind of mental lens we use to look at that reality. Like it or not, you tend to see what you've chosen to see. Choose properly.
Readers, share your thoughts!
Read Next: Your Money Or Your Life
How can I support Casual Kitchen?
Easy. Do all your shopping at Amazon.com via the links on this site! You can also link to me or subscribe to my RSS feed. Finally, consider sharing this article, or any other article you particularly enjoyed here, to Facebook, Twitter (follow me @danielckoontz!) or to bookmarking sites like reddit, digg or stumbleupon. I'm deeply grateful to my readers for their ongoing support.
Labels:
consumer empowerment,
saving money
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)